Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 September 28

< September 27 September 29 >

September 28

Category:Publicly traded companies based in the City of London

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. Good Ol’factory (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Nothing in the UK category other than this subcategory. Not sure that "Publicly traded companies" is a useful category at all, but certainly no obvious need for this geographical split. Rathfelder (talk) 15:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Naturalised citizens of Iraq

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. A broader nomination may be advisable to resolve this issue. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The most recent conqueror and still involved country is the United States, not Britain. This newly created category should have been created with U.S. English, since the English variant in use in Iraq is American English, due to the U.S. military imposing it for the normalized English words found in Iraq for the convenience of the U.S. military. 65.94.42.168 (talk) 09:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tend to oppose as I do not understand why this category has been singled out. It should be part of a discussion to convert all Iraqi categories from British English to American English. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Timelines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: split. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The distinction between "Timelines" and "Wikipedia timelines" is unclear, I would suggest to turn Category:Timelines into a disambiguation page, directing to both Category:Chronology and Category:Wikipedia timelines. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Politicians from the District of Columbia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All other occupation categories for Washington, D.C. are XXXX from Washington, D.C. not from the District of Columbia. A move would put it in line with the rest. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.