Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 April 11

< April 10 April 12 >

April 11

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Procedural listing, category was tagged by anon editor in February but not listed until now. WP:SMALLCAT, contains only one page. – Fayenatic London 14:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Populated places established in 1168

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge and delete as specified in the amended nomination. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A single entry in this category with very little or no prospects for growth. In line with the category guidelines, where reliable foundation dates exist, populated place articles should be categorised by year for 1500 and later, by decade from the 1200s to the 1490s, by century from the 10th century BC to the 13th century and by millennium for the 2nd millennium BC and earlier. Greenshed (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Adding a parent and sibling decade category; as the nomination merges straight from year category to century, the 1110s decade cat would be left isolated by the original proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Fayenatic London 14:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hatnote templates documentation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 20:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unclear scope, currently only has Template:Hatnote templates. DannyS712 (talk) 07:12, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Background (I created this category): I think this category had more pages years ago (multiple Hatnote doc pages); see also its presence in parent Category:Hatnote templates i.e., the complete hatnote overview. Today the only content is a navbox (as template documentation, not for mainspace).
Rename (move) template, delete category. For its content, I propose renaming Template:Hatnote templates into Template:Navbox Hatnotes (non-controvesial imo). Then empty this category, and delete it. The moved navbox template indeed could be categorised Category:Template documentation as proposed (but not by category move or renaming). -DePiep (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wartime cross-dressers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. There was a suggestion that a category be renamed, but not enough discussion about the renaming to draw any conclusions, so there is no prejudice against speedy renomination for renaming. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a defining feature. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That name would be an improvement. It may be better to create that category and move articles to it (manually) to check they belong in it (e.g. there might be some who were sailors rather than soldiers). There are also some articles where the category tag appears to be incorrect (e.g. here it was added to an article which has no mention of cross-dressing). DexDor (talk) 05:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Legal drama video games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 22:15, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, as far as I am aware, Ace Attorney is the only legal video game series in existence. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 00:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kenyan superheroes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Last discussion had no consensus due to nobody else contributing, so I'm nominating it again. There's only one single article in the category, and it could be argued that it doesn't even belong in the category. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 00:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.