- ONYC Hair (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
Undelete Per my check the subject is notable, and the deleted administrator said the reason for speedy deletion is because the article has been deleted before, per my check i wasn't the one that wrote the article in 2015, i believe overtime articles should be improved and if there's any issue with an article it should be stated on creating admin's talk page or article talk page considering the stress one has to go through finding sources and an writing an article from a neutral point of view while avoiding Tabloid Journalism, for this reason the deleting administrator's point doesn't seem valid, per Neutral point of view the article should be allowed for more improvements in this case. Is Nutin 06:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted for two reasons : first, as recreation of previously deleted article, second , as purely promotional article (in addition, there's no real evidence for notability.I suggested that the place to try again would be as a Draft. DGG ( talk ) 07:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse WP:CSD. This is such a blatent advertisement, I'm not inclined to tempundelete it, but here's one example sentence: On 25th September 2017, The hair company released a new Luxury Beach Wave Hair product in celebration of its CEO's birthday and 10 years in business.. Barf. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse definitely blatant advertising and I would have happily deleted it under G11. The recreation did have more sources than the original but at a glance I don't think they would have overcome the notability concerns. Hut 8.5 19:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse, G11 is right. Note that this on its own doesn't stop anyone recreating the article (although the concerns raised in the AFD still ought to be addressed), so long as that article isn't purely promotional in nature. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]
- A redirect could be created, but the related article is currently at AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thelma Okoro) and looks likely to be deleted. Any new article would have to be created as a draft. Peter James (talk) 21:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|