Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 19

< December 18	December 20 >

December 19

File:U+210B.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC) Also nominating:[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U S S HarrietLane.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, inferior version of File:USS Harriet Lane.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:32, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U-O 000A.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

basically every one of the user's uploads appears to be a copyright violation. this image is high-res but given that just about every image has been taken from somewhere random on the internet, no reason to think this is any different. this image appears all over the internet but I can only find lower-res versions. no exif data fwiw. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U-San-Agustin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of undated statue, no freedom of panorama in the philippines Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S Airways at CUN.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U. S. Senator Charles Sumner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, essentially identical to File:Charles Sumner Brady-Handy.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine on deletion. Cmguy777 (talk) 05:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. 50 in Bowie, MD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army 1LT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army 2LT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army 5-star GEN.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army CPT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army GEN.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army COL.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army BG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army LTG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Army MG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. presidential election, 2004.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. presidential election, 2004.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[[:File:]]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. No image name is specified. Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[[:File:]] ([{{fullurl:File:|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2011+December+19%23File%3A%5D%5D}} delete] | [[File talk:|talk]] | [{{fullurl:File:|action=history}} history] | links | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File: listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

the image didnt upload properly Pounds6 (talk) 04:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MUK-audio-launch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use, album cover is already included in the article, this image serves no extra purpose to discuss the soundtrack as it is an image from a launch party. —SpacemanSpiff 04:40, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can we keep the file as we can use it for editing other sections of the film in future?--Jenith (talk) 04:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It fails WP:NFCC 1 and 8 for sure, there's no reason for any commentary about the presence of these three people at a launch party and therefore it serves no illustrative purpose (add to that, launch party images are very often freely available). —SpacemanSpiff 08:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Upper Room Devotional (Open).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not free, and not the own work of the uploader (the photo, yes, the item in the photo, no). I do not think that this meets NFCC #8. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image is appropriate for illustrating The Upper Room (United Methodist Church), as well as devotional literature in general. Please do not delete this image. Thank you, Bmbaker88 (talk) 05:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is noting compelling about the inside of the book, it's plain text in a standard arrangement. This can be easily described, and therefore does not justify the inclusion of two full pages of copyrighted prose. In order for this to be kept, it must meet all of the points outlined at WP:NFCC. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Under CSD F3 as this book picture has a improper license. Also under CSD F4 as no source is mentioned. I tagged this picture under both the deletion criterias. --Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 06:40, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read F3. F3 only applies to a small group of licenses that are not compatible with wikipedia. --Guerillero | My Talk 07:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - The source information has been provided. I own this devotional and took the picture myself. Bmbaker88 (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Guerillero is correct, this does not fall under F3. The source was never in question either. This is entirely a fair-use issue, and one I thought was straightforward enough to bring straight to FfD. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under F9. Taking a photograph of a copyrighted work creates a derivative work and does not supercede the copyright on the original. Although the uploader undoubtedly acted in good faith, this is a copyright infringement. —teb728 t c 13:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:800px-U 330, Snåttsta.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; I copied an image from Housecarl, rotated it manually, and tried to reintegrate it into the page. I do not know licensing rules and regulations so I will leave it to someone more experienced Goldiegopher (talk) 05:51, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: original image is File:U 330, Snåttsta.jpg is on the commons with a rotation request which should be completed by a bot within 2 days. This image is a much lower resolution and if the uploader was in a hurry, he could just rotated it offline and then reupload over the same image but at full size. He can still do that but, either way, this one is redundant. ww2censor (talk) 06:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. CSD tagged under F1.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 09:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:At His Feet Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Guerillero (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted book cover (the license information present is not correct, the uploader took the photo but did not design the book cover, is not the publisher, etc.) that is used only in a gallery. I'm sure that there are devotionals old enough that their copyright has expired, so this fails the NFCC on multiple counts. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:56, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sven is incorrect in his reasoning. The image simply helps illustrate the concept of devotional literature, as this image helps illustrate the concepts of books here: Book#Types_of_books. Thank you, Bmbaker88 (talk) 06:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Under CSD F3 as this book cover picture has a improper license. Also under CSD F4 as no source is mentioned. I tagged this picture under both the deletion criterias. --Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 06:40, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see my reasoning above --Guerillero | My Talk 07:04, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:At His Feet (Open).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is noting compelling about the inside of the book, it's plain text in a standard arrangement. This can be easily described, and therefore does not justify the inclusion of two full pages of copyrighted prose. In order for this to be kept, it must meet all of the points outlined at WP:NFCC. Since it's only used in a gallery, I don't think it does that. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Under CSD F3 as this book picture has a improper license. Also under CSD F4 as no source is mentioned. I tagged this picture under both the deletion criterias. --Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 06:40, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The source information has been provided. I own this devotional and took the picture myself. Bmbaker88 (talk) 07:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Guerillero is correct, this does not fall under F3. The source was never in question either. This is entirely a fair-use issue, and one I thought was straightforward enough to bring straight to FfD. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under F9. Taking a photograph of a copyrighted work creates a derivative work and does not supercede the copyright on the original. Although the uploader undoubtedly acted in good faith, this is a copyright infringement. —teb728 t c 11:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a copyvio per F9. Snowball anyone? – ukexpat (talk) 14:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frederic Taylor Framework Table.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image can be represented as text Sreejith K (talk) 12:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:20060510-AfD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned screen capture of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities. The image doesn't really have any encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 17:32, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed. No point on the image being there, but no rational to CSD - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 01:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:All in a Night's Work VideoCover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's already the theatrical poster in the article, so this DVD cover doesn't appear necessary. The Evil IP address (talk) 18:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tp colossus small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely small copy of File:Tp colossus.jpg ("Sharpened thumbnail, do not delete. Full size version: image:tp colossus.jpg"). Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 21:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yourboi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to delete my picture, am not using it anymore Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 22:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CIXX FM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low Quality Jamesadobos (talk) 22:40, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guatemala 001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unknown Subject, no use to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:58, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guatemala 2004.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unencyclopaedic, no use to keep Image only used on deleted page Redrock property management Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:00, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gud1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unencyclopaedic, no use to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gufc crest.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unencyclopaedic, no use to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guida.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unknown Subject, no use to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guiti saberi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unknown Subject, no use to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:36, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.