Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 March 22

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:060803b chaotic time series prediction.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CommodiCast (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Previously deleted per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 May 6#File:060803b chaotic time series prediction.png in 2010 and then undeleted per Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 355#File:060803b chaotic time series prediction.png in January 2021. The original rationale for deletion, Orphaned file, superseded by c:File:Chaotic Time Series Prediction.svg, continues to apply. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't mind if this file is deleted again, since I still have a local copy saved. (I'll probably get around to completing that SVG version one of these days.) LegionMammal978 (talk) 02:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewRibenaDesign.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cabe6403 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Exceeds c:COM:De minimis. Because of it's use in Ribena, it could possibly be kept with an appropriate fair use tag and rationale added, but it cannot be transferred to Commons and should not be kept here as it is.  ★  Bigr Tex 00:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyatizvyozdnaya vodka.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tarrou (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Exceeds c:COM:De minimis. Because of it's use in Pyatizvyozdnaya, it could possibly be kept with an appropriate fair use tag and rationale added, but it cannot be transferred to Commons and should not be kept here as it is.  ★  Bigr Tex 00:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pjati.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tarrou (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Exceeds c:COM:De minimis. If it was used in an article, it could possibly be kept with an appropriate fair use tag and rationale added, but it cannot be transferred to Commons and should not be kept here as it is.  ★  Bigr Tex 00:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norm Provan 1965 portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vox3000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per Template:PD-Australia, this image is not Public domain as it was not published before 1946. With Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Australia, Australia's copyright is 70 years after publication for anonymous works. As this image claims to be from 1965, it won't be free until 2036. Finally, as Norm Provan is alive, this image can't be used as a non-free image either. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:37, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:FRANCESCO MUTTI.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pastelli (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder and releasing into the public domain. The uploader being the copyright holder seems unlikely. This image is used all over the internet and on pizza boxes. For example here (scroll down) and somebody selling prints. This may be public domain, but more specific information about its history and publication would be needed to establish that. Whpq (talk) 13:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Director Selvendran during the shoot of his latest independent tamil album.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Selvendran.selva85 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Fiddle Faddle 15:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pattie.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by El mondo2000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Possible copyright violation due to low resolution. Uploader has no other files. Can be replaced with File:Potato patties 1.PNG if needed. The validity of the licensing was also brought up at Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Archive/Oct 2010. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - The image is in use and the evidence for a copyright violation is not compelling. A photo uploaded in 2007 could very plausibly have a low resolution. And early generation digital camera and cropping could result in something like we have here. I have no objection to its deletion if its use were replaced by a higher quality image as suggested in the nomination. This is a very low resolution photo. But if it is in use, then it should be kept. -- Whpq (talk) 14:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and replaced it with File:Potato patties 1.PNG in the articles. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:GITS SAC 1stGIG Operator.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Biwamasa (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Screenshots of copyrighted TV shows, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.