Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 March 22

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karim Hakimi.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is nothing to show the original of this image is freely licensed. Peripitus (Talk) 10:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MapPDN.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The old revision is obviously a copyright violation of Google Maps and needs to be deleted. The uploader claimed that the first revision was own work by the uploader (which it obviously wasn't) and didn't modify the file information page when uploading the second image, so maybe this means that the second image isn't owk work by the uploader either. Stefan2 (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calcutta Cup Trophy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Non-free trophy. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collevecchio0018.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• According to it:File:Collevecchio0018.JPG, the author is called Lucio De Marcellis. According to it:Utente:Luciodem, the itwiki uploader (it:Utente:Ulissi) is called Stefano Ulissi and thus can't be the photographer. The copyright holder might be it:Utente:Luciodem, though. Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Overwritten file: five in one. Delete all due to various different problems.

1. File uploaded by Revolving Bugbear (talk · contribs) and Musha (talk · contribs): the file information page appears to identify this as a fair use image. Delete as it is currently unused.
2. File uploaded by Arencher (talk · contribs): the only copyright information we have is Family photo, no known copyrights. Family photographs are typically unpublished and often anonymous (it is not known by which family member they were taken) and are therefore usually copyrighted unless at least 120 years old. This picture is probably more recent than so and therefore has to be assumed to be unfree.
3. File uploaded by Arvindvenkat (talk · contribs), Angusmclellan (talk · contribs) and Finnrind (talk · contribs): Sourced to Personal Collection of Trichy Sankaran and licensed as "GFDL-self". Missing evidence of permission. The fact that the picture appears in Trichy Sankaran's^[who?] collection does not automatically mean that Trichy Sankaran^[who?] is the copyright holder.
4. File uploaded by Miserlou (talk · contribs): No source and no licence.
5. File uploaded by Drwessroberts (talk · contribs): Claimed to be {{PD-USGov}}, but no source has been provided. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kristian Alexander 2015.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• EXIF: "Copyright holder www.themomento.com" Eeekster (talk) 21:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Byers Four Mills Recipe Book Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright term in Canada is life + 50 years, so this book from the 1930s could easily still be under copyright. It's not currently used in any way which would be covered under fair use. Psychonaut (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.