Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 April 1

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete If anyone can find more I'll delete them. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:36, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Toilets in China → Toilets in Japan (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]
• Toilets in Taiwan → Toilets in Japan (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]
• Toilets in the People's Republic of China → Toilets in Japan (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

It makes no sense. These should be deleted. Per Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2013_March_25#Toilets_in_the_Republic_of_China discussion. Cold Season (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as misleading, and per previous outcome. --BDD (talk) 23:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per BDD.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• snowball delete - don't need a consensus on that, IMO, and created by a sock. Kayau (talk · contribs) 12:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete These are so similar to the previous discussion that we can delete them per that discussion and don't need a new one. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:08, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete They should have been deleted per the previous discussion. Ryan Vesey 02:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Technocommunism → Catherine A. Fitzpatrick (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Neologism only used by the redirect target, has a sole whatlinkshere. LFaraone 22:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The redirect is used (20-30 hits per month) and per the nominator it's not ambiguous and not worthy of a separate article. The presence or absence of internal incomming links is explicitly not a reason to keep or delete a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 22:40, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Addref → Template:Refimprove (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Superfluous redirect to another template to save a few letters. Unused personal hobby. (manual due to Twinkle failure) The Banner talk 20:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is harmless, and probably useful to some people (WP:R#KEEP point 5). Note that this was created in 2007 but quickly speedily deleted out of process by now banned user:Rich Farmbrough with the rationale "unused redirect - namespace pollution", which has never been a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thryduulf (talk) 22:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This redirect is similar to that of Template:Cop (which was kept), in that it is an abbreviation for "add references". --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Does no harm, and makes sense given the redirect name. --BDD (talk) 23:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• បីប្លីអូក្រាហ្វី → Bibliography (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Delete this redirect because its language is not especially related to its target. Gorobay (talk) 16:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. There is nothing inherently related to the Khmer language or Khmer culture about the topic of bibliographies. Thryduulf (talk) 22:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTDIC wikipedia is not a translation dictionary. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.