Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 1

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Tapology → Topology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A reader is probably more likely to be looking for http://www.tapology.org/. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. It's unlikely, but mildly plausible as a misspelling. But given the use pointed out in the nomination, it might be better to have this as an intentional red link (there are a couple existing incorrect links to it). Side note, @1234qwer1234qwer4: the creator of this made a lot of equally questionable redirects you might be interested in checking out. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Deacon Vorbis: Thanks, all marked as {{R from misspelling}} for now. Some could definitely nominated, such as McGill College Avenu, Total Eclipse of the Su, and Vampire: The Masquerade – Redemptio. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. We have no way of knowing whether a user is looking for topology, mixed martial arts, or tap dancing, and it doesn't seem to be worth hatnotes and dab pages. Open to reconsideration if either tapology dot org (tap dancing) or tapology dot com (MMA) becomes notable enough for an article. --Trovatore (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is ambiguous and may cause confusion. Uninhibited Search is better. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Apple sticker → Price look-up code  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Plum sticker → Price look-up code  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Pear sticker → Price look-up code  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Tomato sticker → Price look-up code  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Avacado sticker → Price look-up code  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Peach sticker → Price look-up code  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Banana sticker → Price look-up code  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete similar to kiwi sticker at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 16#Kiwi sticker (I'm not sure that a price look-up code is known as a "kiwi sticker", or that a kiwi sticker is a price look-up code). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Implausible search terms. Aasim 15:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I would say that "Apple sticker" commonly refers to stickers of the Apple logo which come in product boxes. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I can't imagine many people knowing to search for Price look-up code. Admittedly these may be slightly ambiguous, but I find it highly implausible that anyone would go searching "fruit sticker" (except maybe for Apple) without this being what they are looking for, and I disagree that such a search is implausible. A7V2 (talk) 09:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete all: as unlikely. "Avacado+sticker"&iax=images&ia=images This is what seems to be called an "avocado sticker". "plum+sticker"&iax=images&ia=images Plum stickers are even weirder. Other searches resulted in similar results. (The apple case has already been discussed.) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Cheridel Alejandrino → SM Supermalls  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. Searching online, Alejandrino appears to have won a company award at Supermalls [1]. While it's not impossible that this award may be notable (given the coverage that it apparently gets in major Filipino newspapers), it's unlikely to be due for inclusion at the target. Delete, either due to lack of mention or on WP:R#DELETE #10 grounds. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Enwiki has several mentions of Cheridel Alejandrino and in this case Search is much better than a redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:LIVE → Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a commonly used shortcut. Sysages (talk | contribs) 17:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Long-standing project namespace redirect which has targeted its current target (minus random vandalism and unproductive edits) for almost 14 years. Steel1943 (talk) 17:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: No valid reason for deletion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – I think it may also be referred to the hypothetical WikiProject Live Broadcasting. However, since such WPJ don't exist, the current target is valid per others. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy close. Nominator has been indef-blocked per WP:NOTHERE. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Brian Lennox → List of Cork City F.C. players  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Best to just delete redirect. (Subject is not included in "List of Cork City F.C. players". Because subject was/is not a player with the football club. Subject was chairperson. Subject doesn't meet any other notability criteria. And so, at one point, a related stub/malformed DAB was converted to a redirect. While that action may have been the simplest action at the time, am not sure it should remain in place. As it results in an EASTEREGG. Having nothing at that title is better than having an inappropriate redirect.) Guliolopez (talk) 12:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn as nominator thanks to pburka's contributions to the article. (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Undisputed Cinema → Gina Prince-Bythewood  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. I've fixed the problem. pburka (talk) 01:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Stratus Film Company → Yari Film Group  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bulls Eye Entertainment → Yari Film Group  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Kilter Films → Jonathan Nolan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. as nominator thanks to pburka's contributions to the article. (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Minnesota Logging Company → Jenna Bans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. I've corrected the problem. pburka (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Top Kick Productions → Chuck Norris  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted after history merge by Anthony Appleyard. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Sudan medical cases chart → Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Sudan medical cases chart  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While there is no problem with redirects from draft to mainspace, this redirect was made by one of the IPs from the range 186.111.128.0/20 (now blocked for three months due to disrputive editing). Two IPs from the range 186.111.128.0/0 was investigated for being sockpuppets of the blocked user Bedriczwaleta, so this was possibly made in evasion of a block. SMB99thx my edits 10:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Regardless of the above, the page at Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Sudan medical cases chart was a cut-and-paste move from the redirect. I'll be placing a history merge request here in a moment. Steel1943 (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Wait for the admins to perform the HISTMERGE. After that, it will be deleted. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 18:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Done already deleted by Anthony Appleyard as a part of history merge. Should be closed soon. SMB99thx my edits 22:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 13375934k → Leet  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

And the meaning of this is? Doesn't seem to be a logical search term. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Appears to be leetspeak for "leetspeak", an alternative title for the target. Doesn't appear to be common enough to warrant a redirect. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as it still works and represents the article as a whole, user visits shouldn't be the only deciding factor. CaptainGalaxy 20:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Valid and extremely relevant synonym. It makes complete sense to have a translation of the full form of the title in the language being described within the article. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 10:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Meta:Global bans#Criteria for global bans. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Cross-wiki abuse → Meta:Global bans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think this should redirect to meta:Global bans especially when it claims to be redirecting to a page about Cross-wiki abuse. While global bans are a response to cross-wiki abuse, they are not the same thing. This is like if WP:Vandalism-only account redirected to WP:blocking policy. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 01:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• It could probably target to Meta:Global bans#Criteria for global bans instead? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget: per MJL or delete as 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC) xfdvote bug, see Special:Permalink/977010352#Publishing old text[reply]
• Retarget: per MJL. This does get a couple dozen pageviews a month, so it is helpful to direct these users to the place providing the most information about the topic. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.