Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 26

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Schoolmates → Iskoolmates  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I do not think that this Filipino TV series is the best target for "Schoolmates", which is a common noun throughout the English world. While we do not have a particular article on being schoolmates or Classmates, we do have Alumni, which is a related concept, and to my mind, seems a better target, where a hatnote can be added to point to the TV show. -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

67.70, Iskool is the Filipino translation to School. So, move the page you requested to Schoolmates (TV series), and change the redirect to another page. This can happen if your request will be accepted. 176.33.242.229 (talk) 11:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to student or alumnus as {{r from related topic}}. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this recent creation which is a common noun. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not sure if its worth retargetting to student or alumnus since they are not closely synonymous to each other although they can be considered as related terms. As for anon's suggestion above for page move, , I don't think the show is marketed as "Schoolmates" as online English references call the show Iskoolmates. --Lenticel ^(talk) 06:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete its not mentioned in the target, I would have suggested redirecting to the same target as Schoolmate, the singular but that doesn't exist and Classmates is a DAB without anything useful. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Editors are divided between the status quo, disambiguation, and retarget suggestions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Central Transportation → Stevens Point Transit  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous search term which could refer to a number of possible targets, such as Penn Central Transportation Company, Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation, Central Maryland Transportation Alliance, etc. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The current target seems to be the only one actually referred to as "Central Transportation." The others appear to only use the phrase as part of their long-form, less common, names. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'd argue disambiguating to be the most logical option in this instance, given that "Central Transportation" can refer to quite a large number of topics. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  If there are other entities called "Central Transportation," I'm okay with disambiguation. Otherwise, the examples you state wouldn't be valid targets per WP:PTM. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Presidentman. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Public transport as {{r from related topic}}. Central Transportation —> Central transportation —> Centralized transportation —> Urban transit —> Public transit. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Edward-Woodrow Central to Centralized is a huge difference, and I don't see where it says Centralized transportation = Urban transit either. Aaron Liu (talk) 20:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'd support this over the current target, but ideally I'd prefer disambiguation. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• CYP81A → Cytochrome P450  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a family of cytochrome P450s, but they are not mentioned or described at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. This was apparently created for use in a link at Treatments in California agriculture; I have replaced the link with one directly to the target so as to not be astonishing. This should probably be deleted per WP:RFD#DELETE#10 i.e. WP:REDYES, but I would be okay with retargeting to the page where it is mentioned(Treatments in California agriculture), as it would give some information to anyone searching it. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The P450 subfamily can probably support an article on its own with the interest it has drawn in recent years due to several members being responsible for the multiple herbicide resistances seen in agricultural weeds. Pretty niche and technical though. Pubmed search ― Synpath 06:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Magpul massoud → Remington ACR  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is apparently an awful misspelling (and miscapitalization) of Magpul Masada, an alternative name for the target that also redirects there. There is an old stub in the article history that was almost immediately redirected to essentially an identical topic, there is no chance this content would be preserved at Afd so I think we can free ourselves of it here (WP:SNOW). Mdewman6 (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Clearly a misspelling of the Magpul Masada. JTC22 (talk) 23:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK Mdewman6 (talk) 01:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Voery impulasible tyop. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 03:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: implausible typos and search term. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. There was interest in disambiguating WP:SPACE, however that was not this nomination's intent, and that may be a separate discussion. Jay 💬 04:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia talk:SPACE → Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Space  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Wikipedia:SPACE targets the main page for WikiProject Astronomy and has done so since 2016, but the corresponding talk shortcut targets Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Space, which has been a defunct WikiProject for a long time (the last new section excluding a notification from this RfD was created in 2019). Both of these should be consistent, and it is a lot more likely that people are looking for Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy than the current target. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate both WP:SPACE and WT:SPACE for WP:WikiProject Astronomy (stars, planets, asteroids, space weather, outer space telescopes, outer space probes) and WP:WikiProject Spaceflight (satellites, satellite television, astronauts, space tourists, space rockets, space telescopes, space probes) -- there seems to be a lot incorrect assumptions that spaceflight is somehow astronomy and vice versa in both categories, templates, redirects and stub-types, that still remain after the WikiProject Space was disbanded as being an unwieldy conflation of aerospace and space science. This is one of those remaining cleanup issues. -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 02:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • There also being Help:Whitespace, for additional uses -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 05:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Building on this further, I think it could also be helpful to link to Wikipedia:Namespace from such a DAB. I could easily picture a user seeing mentions of "mainspace", "userspace", etc. and assuming that the namespaces are collectively known as just spaces. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to the same talk page as the talk page's target namely Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy otherwise disambiguate WP:SPACE. Its confusing to have a main page and its talk page go to different pages. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to match WP:SPACE. This should be uncontroversial, WT:X should always match WP:X. If there is a desire to change WP:SPACE, then that redirect should be brought here for discussion. For what it's worth, I don't see a strong argument for changing that redirect. It especially should not be disambiguated because then it would no longer be able to function as a shortcut. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Gothic hilted British infantry swords (1822, 1827, 1845, 1854 and 1892 patterns) → Gothic hilted British infantry swords  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessarily long page title, unlikely to be a search term. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: per WP:RFD#KEEP guideline 4. The page history seems to be: page originally created at The Gothic Hilted British Infantry Swords (1822, 1827, 1845, 1854 and 1892 Patterns) on 19 Mar 2006; same day moved to Gothic Hilted British Infantry Swords (1822, 1827, 1845, 1854 and 1892 Patterns); moved to Gothic Hilted British Infantry Swords (1822, 1827, 1845, 1854 and 1892 Patterns) on 21 Feb 2016 per MOS:CAPS; moved to its current title Gothic hilted British infantry swords today. With it largely being at the same title (save for capitalization changes) for 17 years, I think there's a good chance that this could break incoming links TartarTorte 20:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per TartarTorte. A7V2 (talk) 08:17, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per TartarTorte. Fairly popular article too. J947 † ^edits 00:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:SNOW. 2001:4451:8285:B00:9180:5873:29D0:FDF9 (talk) 04:38, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Mugam (2018 film) → Pudhiya Mugam  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is no 2018 film. This targets to a 1990s film. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Puthiya Mugam (unreleased film): It seems that in 2018 the currently unreleased film, Puthiya Mugam, was to be released just by the name of Mugam; however, the release date got pushed back indefinitely. That page itself is currently at AfD, but if that page is deleted then so should this via WP:G8. TartarTorte 14:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget: per TT. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 07:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As Puthiya Mugam (unreleased film) was deleted at AfD, there is no longer an appropriate target on Wikipedia as there is now nothing about a proposed 2018 film named [Puthiya] Mugam. TartarTorte 13:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per TartarTorte --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: the only suitable target was deleted as a result of this AfD, leaving no suitable target for this redirect. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Echo. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Echoic → Onomatopoeia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Wiktionary mentions echo first. [1] fgnievinski (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom IntegerSequences (talk | contribs) 08:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to echo, but I wouldn't be upset to see this deleted either. 〜 Askarion ✉ 11:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to echo, as the {{R from adjective}} since it doesn't make sense to target Onomatopoeia, which only resembles a sound, and not an actual echo itself. Anechoic chamber represents a proper use of the term "echoic", where it is an echoless room. -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 15:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to echo as plausible primary target --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to echo as an {{R from adjective}} per IP. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:48, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to echo: {{R from adjective}}. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).