Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 30

December 30

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 30, 2024.

Individual 1

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 10#Individual 1

Early life and career of Donald Trump

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 7#Early life and career of Donald Trump

Religious views of Donald Trump

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Religious affiliations of presidents of the United States#List of presidents with details on their religious affiliation. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (u — c) 01:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The target section no longer exists. The target article does not seem to contain the specific subject referenced by these redirects: Words beginning with "relig*" exist in the article, but where these words are do not seem to provide information to satisfy readers who are searching these phrases. And ... there does not seem to be a standalone article to target these redirects. (Also, for what it's worth, none of these redirects are {{R from history}} or {{R from merge}}.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

House tree

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 02:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible. C F A 22:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there are significantly more house trees (which I'm assuming are trees that are grown inside a back garden) than tree houses (which are platforms built ONTO a tree that resemble a house) User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 00:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rfpp

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 02:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. C F A 22:36, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfPP redirects there, I think this should be kept. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've bundled RfPP into the nomination. They are both unnecessary and not exclusive to Wikipedia. C F A 22:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the 2nd result on Google JayCubby 22:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The second result for me is Reserve Fund Planning Program. WP:RFPP does not show up until the second page. C F A 22:50, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Huh! JayCubby 05:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Moby cock

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted byRsjaffe. charlotte 👸🎄 22:50, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible. C F A 22:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Heyaaaaalol (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged with {{Db-g7}} in response. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ainmay Agepay

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted. charlotte 👸🎄 22:52, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure what this is supposed to be. C F A 22:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pig Latin, or Igpay Atinlay. Feel free to delete Heyaaaaalol (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Tagged with {{Db-g7}}. Steel1943 (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Face Shrine

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 02:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jimmy Carter's rabbit

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 7#Jimmy Carter's rabbit

Scenic and Wild

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep those containing 'river(s)', delete the rest. -- Tavix (talk) 00:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Without additional qualification, these terms seem a bit too broad and U.S.-centric to make good redirects to this specific topic. The ones lacking "river" in particular could refer to many different things. "National Scenic Waterways" is not a term described at target. Delete all. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 21:00, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 20:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2024 AP Poll

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems ambigous but I'm not totally sure what would be a better target. Could refer to 2024–25 NCAA Division I men's basketball rankings, 2023–24 NCAA Division I men's basketball rankings, 2023–24 NCAA Division I women's basketball rankings, 2024–25 NCAA Division I women's basketball rankings. But college football is the only one that only uses 2024. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 06:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The drafted page could be a WP:SIA under a title like 2024 NCAA Division I rankings, and 2024 AP poll could be an {{R from avoided double redirect}} to it. Jay 💬 07:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but also okay with the disambiguation page that was created. Of the sports that have an AP poll, college football is the only one that uses a single year for the season, while college basketball is a winter sport that is always two years (e.g. "2023-2024"), so the "2024 AP Poll" seems to clearly be the football one (while e.g. "2023-2024 AP poll" should be a disambig for the two basketball polls). Not against a disambiguation, as it's certainly better than deletion. I am pretty skeptical that people typing in 2024 AP Poll would be looking for an Andhra Pradesh election. Legoktm (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to give consideration to the disambiguation draft.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 20:52, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Peanutgate

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8#Peanutgate

BlueAir

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 9#BlueAir

Nick Begich, Jr.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 12#Nick Begich, Jr.

Chick-Fila

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Clear consensus to keep and no reason to relist. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly a pretty weak nom due to the capitalization and the dash, but couldn't it also be possible that a learner who doesn't natively speak english would also be looking for the chicken tenders article (as to which chick fillet isn't a redirect to but also wouldn't mind it existing) User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 10:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I don't think people who are learning English as a second language would add the dash to be honest. I also think the more expected result for this redirect would be the current target. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Even though consensus says to keep, I'm still certain that pronunciation also plays a role here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 11:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep, preferably speedily now. if a not-very-native english speaker would mistake "fila" for something, it'd be one of the word's meanings in other languages, like "queue" in portuguese (whatever that is). even then, it's also pretty implausible that someone would type "chick-fil" expecting literally anything other than that tortured pun of a restaurant chain consarn (formerly cogsan) 12:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close as keep, improperly relisted by nominator. Even I (stubborn as I am), think this is a reasonable error of an unusually styled brand name, and nothing else. 35.139.154.158 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

PITNOL

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 13:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As below, no evidence that this song is referred to by either of these initialisms. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:E9BC:B9ED:405A:596B (talk) 18:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target and creator talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

アメリカ

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 14#アメリカ

Hindh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. No consensus prior to the relist, and no comments after the relist. Per the discussion, I do not foresee another relist providing any clearer result. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 21:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Hindh" isn't mentioned in that section (or anywhere, really). This would be borderline CSDable since there IS technically a prior consensus, but it's not the same target as it was when the previous discussion happened User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 05:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:25, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cilla Single

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 14#Cilla Single

Best Comedy Series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of common television awards categories#Best Series. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:04, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other "Best Comedy Series" awards exist, either using that exact title (Canadian Screen Award for Best Comedy Series, International Emmy Award for Best Comedy Series) or very similar wording (Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Comedy Series, Golden Globe Award for Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy). Suggest disambiguation. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Baltimore

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 6#Wikipedia:Baltimore

Proteen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. charlotte 👸♥ 06:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I could only find mostly NN brand names from a search for "Proteen", and one single YouTube account. Couldn't find anything about people misspelling "protein" as this User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 11:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I also can't find evidence of this being even an uncommon misspelling of protein and there are legitimate reasons to search the specific 'proteen' spelling. It would be a small net negative to cover up search results with such an uncommon (though plausible) spelling error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synpath (talk • contribs) 03:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; seems to be an ambiguous misspelling. Readers can find the correct spelling of protein before going to Wikipedia, and there are other topics which seem to be described as "proteen" with this specific spelling. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to the ambiguity issues shown by 35.139. If you hear "protein" for the first time you're probably going to spell it something like "proteen", but that is insufficient justification IMO to take the reader away from the quite helpful search results. J947 ‡ edits 23:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Johnny Woo (comics)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 14#Johnny Woo (comics)

Freak off

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Wiktionary * Pppery * it has begun... 23:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed an unsourced mention of this phrase at target. Even if a source were added, they're not the same thing: Per [1], there are allegations of sexual exploitation at the White Parties, but that's distinct from the alleged freak-offs in hotel rooms. If there's a place this should target, it's Sean Combs sexual misconduct allegations, but currently "Freak-off" only appears in citations there. If mentioned in the body of that article, I'd support a retarget. Else, delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 03:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This does seem to be genuinely used as a term to refer to the Diddy Parties, as is reported by reliable sources with respect to the lawsuit. So it's used, and it seems to be a reasonable search term for something related to this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mention has not been added at Sean Combs sexual misconduct allegations.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Just added the unhyphenated version to this nomination, as suggested above by 162 etc.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Studio Hamburg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Studio Hamburg is an existing production company in Germany. See its German language article at de:Studio Hamburg. The existence of the incorrect redirect here forces an error when using the standard interlanguage link template when one attempts to create an ill to the German Wikipedia article 'Studio Hamburg'. Doprendek (talk) 00:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).