Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fila3466757

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fila3466757}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Fila3466757

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 22:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


There appears to be a long term pattern of falsifying information and serious incivility. The user appears to be switching accounts to avoid scrutiny and prevent being blocked. They seem to accumulate warnings and then hop to a new account. Jehochman Talk 22:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed ScotRail421 (talk · contribs) = Farlack913 (talk · contribs) = Fila3466757 (talk · contribs) = Filarules34555667894 (talk · contribs) = FilarulesFirstsucks (talk · contribs). Rydo, ScotRail DBSO and Farlack913 are  Stale. The rest are  Inconclusive.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed the above per Blnguyen (I'd also been working on this case, unawares). Also FA53764968566fgtu7757 (talk · contribs), Fila07 (talk · contribs) - Alison ❤ 08:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've indeffed the socks and blocked the Fila3466757 account for one week. The user was not blocked previously that I can tell, and they did make some useful contributions. If there is a recurrence, the block length should be much longer next time. I've also tagged the accounts. Jehochman Talk 14:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.