Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Technoquat/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

• Plaentain (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recently-created account immediately sets about trolling AN with questions about incontinence (cf. recent sock RouteLeader). Quack, quack. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now my talkpage as well. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

User:Hurting Flashtire might be him as well based on [1]. Tijfo098 (talk) 02:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly User:Tnemirepxe-Hcaerb as well (another bot fake). Can we get some sort of range block? Tijfo098 (talk) 04:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly User:TheBlackWatcher as well... – Connormah (talk) 04:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed as Technoquat. Also  Confirmed as Technoquat is User:UnhappyandNoFriends.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 16:54, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Everyone is blocked and tagged, so closing. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Hurting Flashtire also  Confirmed and tagged.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 02:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Ice Cream is really tasty (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Lome-Wikia (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Ice Cream is really tasty: User page + help desk q + user talk spam. Unless he's editing by proxy, I bet you'll catch some trolling socks from yesterday too. Tijfo098 (talk) 17:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC) Tijfo098 (talk) 17:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lome-Wikia: a WP:DUCK case methinks, but he posted an unblock request. Tijfo098 (talk) 17:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• User:BartholomewParalegal, another possible one... – Connormah (talk) 01:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Both are  Confirmed. Two additional suspects were added to the previous case after it was closed: Tnemirepxe-Hcaerb (talk · contribs) is  Confirmed and TheBlackWatcher (talk · contribs) is  Unrelated. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:31, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • BartholomewParalegal (talk · contribs) is also  Confirmed. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Technoquatsy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quack. Shirt58 (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk note: No real point in tagging these now per WP:DENY, and the latest sock has already been {{checkuserblock}}ed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Signpost Invert's Mother (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Signpost Invert's Teacher (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Signpost Invert (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I highly doubt these two accounts are what they claim to be, given that their usernames are too similar. Also, no real teacher or parent would discuss this on-wiki publicly.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC) Jasper Deng (talk) 01:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly linked to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Technoquat? – Connormah (talk) 02:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

 Confirmed all related to each other, and  Likely that the master is Technoquat. --Versageek 02:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Yep, those are definitely Technoquat. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Moved casename to Technoquat and closing.
   — Berean Hunter (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• WerwesaCake (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• WeCanBeFamousWCBR (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Battleby (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Similar disruptive helpdesk posts to recent TQ socks Crouon Crouton Croutson and Abyrorevsky Mainn. Checkuser requested and self-endorsed for sleepers. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention Yunshui 雲‍水 10:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Yunshui 雲‍水 10:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• WerwesaCake (talk · contribs) = WeCanBeFamousWCBR (talk · contribs). All three  Likely to be Technoquat. No sleepers are apparent at this time. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Socks blocked, master was indeffed last year. NativeForeigner ^Talk 20:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• On further inspection, going to keep open until Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Spekkommissie resolves. NativeForeigner ^Talk 20:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing and archiving to make a hist merge here easier. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ / Join WER 23:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Spekkommissie (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Listen000t-gam (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Crouon Crouton Croutson (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• The Dark Lord Sauron (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Growen Rowen (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 76.31.89.90 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 8.18.145.144 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• FiajSandwich (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Abyrorevsky Mainn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Asiew For (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Echoreems (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Helpdesk trolling, harassing User:Dodger67. I've included the other helpdesk trolls from today because they're obviously someone's socks, and probably all related. A couple are already blocked. — The Potato Hose 21:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Added Echoreems (talk · contribs) as self-admitted. Says s/he's Technoquat (talk · contribs) if that means anything? — The Potato Hose 08:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

1. Ordeerligg (talk · contribs) and Bringterugapartetoilette (talk · contribs) should be added to the list as well, similar trolling of the HD over the last 36 hours. Heiro 23:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: some idiot (me) misspelled the name of the sockmaster. I have corrected it, can someone merge this into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spekkommissie? — The Potato Hose 01:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The person behind this is not quite fluent in Afrikaans, however from the racist stuff they spewed on my talk page a few days ago he is clearly familiar with extreme right wing South African politics of 20 or so years ago. I doubt 4chan kiddies or similar would be able to manage such a level of sophisication, the only "false note" is the unidiomatic Afrikaans. I'm sure of Spekkomissie, 76.31.89.90, and Oordeerlig, but as far as I'm aware I've not interacted with any of the others. The admin User:Drmies would probably be able to shed some light on this as she helped me deal with the initial attacks against me. Thanks Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Listen000t-gam (talk · contribs) claims at their talk page "My real name is Edmund, I live in South Africa". Does Bringterugapartetoilette (talk · contribs) mean anything in Afrikaans? Because when I use Google Translate "Bring te rug aparte toilette" translates from Afrikaans to English as "Bring back separate toilets", Heiro 08:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it is a reference to the racial segregation of Apartheid. Such comments are typical of Spekkomissie too, although milder than what he posted on my Talk page. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heironymous, that translation coupled with some knowledge of SA history should tell you enough. I can't say from Bringterug's edits that they are Spek; Listen's reference to Koffiefontein is somewhat interesting; Spek shows an interest in places associated with the Boer history and their meaning, invented or not, in this racist resurgence movement. So CU has already been run on Ordeerligg and Listen? Drmies (talk) 13:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It does and I assumed as much, I just don't trust google translate 100%, it's bitten me a few times. I was hoping for confirmation from Dodger, who seems to speak Afrikaans. Heiro 17:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am indeed fluent in Afrikaans, any time you need a translation, you know where to find me. I have confirmed the translation of "Bring terug aparte toilette". Listen's reference to Koffiefontein is indeed "interesting". It's a sleepy little town that used to have a very rich diamond mine but downscaled operations quite drastically some years ago. I know this because my siblings all live quite close to it. BTW Low frequency radios are used for underground communication so a person trading in old mining equipment in Koffiefontein seems a plausible story. The middle-aged, blue-collar, white, male, demographic is associated quite strongly with white-supremacist "bring back apartheid" political views, as they were the biggest losers of privilege when apartheid ended. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I've added Abyrorevsky Mainn (talk · contribs), who has just popped up at the help desk.diff. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm a bit concerned that we may be conflating two (or more) unrelated cases. There is the one case of Spekkommissie and socks who have a right wing racist Afrikaner agenda who have targetted me specifically. Then there are various incidents of Help page trolling without the political agenda. I suspect they may be separate. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Roger makes a good point: let's not lump all the trolls together. FiajSandwich, yes. Sauron, no. Mainn, obviously not. Growen Rowen is blocked after CU, but I see little in the content of their edits that makes them Spek (besides the SA text on their user page and the general characteristics of trolling). It is of course entirely possible that they're simply branching out, and it is possible that a kind of coordinated attack leads to a larger variety of disruptions--Salvo et al, I'm interested in some of the CU identifications, privately or here. Drmies (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Dropping a note here that I blocked Asiew For (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Legoktm (talk) 20:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• User:Asiew For left this post on my talk page. I'm feeling very vulnerable right now, I'd appreciate it if an admin can contact me privately to discuss protective measures. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I sent you an email. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• CheckUser requested - Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - All help desk trolling, plus other stuff. Either a group of 4chan kids or socking. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 00:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Some of these accounts are User:Technoquat. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Other than The Dark Lord Sauron, who is editing from a different continent and device, all of these accounts, including the archived case, are  Likely to be Technoquat.  No comment with respect to IP address(es). ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:54, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Moved and did history merge. Tagged already blocked socks, awaiting review of IPs and unblocked editor. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ / Join WER 23:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• IPs seem to be related but are stale. Without technical evidence I don't think Sauron is proven to be connected, and is also stale. NativeForeigner ^Talk 03:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Sawwooddoow (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

The sock is already blocked, but evidently the user intends to use sleepers or otherwise sock more. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Sazzi Olsberg (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Adding this one too. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Warrink Lubjublana (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

One more. Legoktm (talk) 22:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk endorsed - Yeah, this seems like a pretty good time to peek at the logs. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 21:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Confirmed Sazzi Olsberg, B D Minimalist, , Sawwooddoow, Warrink Lubjublana, and previous socks. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 05:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Thanks. All related accounts have been tied up. NativeForeigner ^Talk 10:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Ivilbderoneday (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Another new user targeting the helpdesk and User:AndyTheGrump. (The user page is copied from here). January (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I am having to defend myself against this claim.

• 1. I have not trolled, all I did is ask some Helpdesk questions
• 2. I am new to Wikipedia, I do not know what a Technoquat is, or who it is
• 3. I was just a little unhappy at the troll comments on the userpage of User:AndyTheGrump.

I need answers now please. That is all I have done. I have not trolled anyone, i have not been mean to anyone. I have not violated any rules. --Ivilbderoneday (talk) 16:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk endorsed as there is a large amount of very suspicious activity here and a CU may be the best tool for this. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 16:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Confirmed. T. Canens (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• 555 The Mason Austria (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Salady Salad (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Quack, quack. Is there nothing we can do about this guy? — The Potato Hose 19:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC) — The Potato Hose 19:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New user shows up to Help Desk asking a question which shows a precocious knowledge of Wikipedia, that is the sort of question that shows knowledge of Wikipedia rules and procedures. Technoquat's prior socks first actions were to ask questions which showed a prior knowledge of paid editing issues, and immediately after being blocked as a sock puppet, this new account was created and started asking questions about WP:ENGVAR. Given the similarity in MOs, and the fact that Technoquat has been very active lately, I am requesting a checkuser to confirm this behavioral evidence, and to look for sleepers. Jayron32 19:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Merged two reports together and requested CU. Legoktm (talk) 19:19, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Administrator note I blocked User:555 The Mason Austria since it was an obvious quacker, not 100% sure about the other one. Legoktm (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Both named accounts are  Confirmed, along with Elesi Stalk Warden Beacon, A x e r 1988, and Smak Snipkop.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:32, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Blocking all, including Elesi Stalk Warden Beacon (talk · contribs), A x e r 1988 (talk · contribs), and Smak Snipkop (talk · contribs). Is it possible to IP-block this? Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• It's already autoblocked. By the time the 24 hours is up they will have moved on to any of the myriad dynamic IPs available to them (unfortunately). I'm wondering whether an edit filter could be cobbled together to help limit the disruption? --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know much about the magic behind the edit filter, but my impression is that I'm not sure it could recognize this editing as different from genuine new users with a genuine question. The style of questioning and writing is something that it's easy for an experienced human being to be able to recognize fairly easily (that is, once you see the pattern, it is obvious) but which a language parser used by a program may not be able to flag. Is there a rangeblock possibility? Are there other good-faith editors using the same range as this person? --Jayron32 19:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• With regard to the edit filter, if someone with the technical ability wanted to email me I could provide some additional (not private, just BEANS-Y) info that may help. With regard to a range block, I see Technoquat in a number of large dynamic ranges, there may be too much collateral damage. DoRD has much more experience with working with range blocks than I do and may have some valuable input. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 20:04, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Can WMF's legal counsel not just contact this twit's ISP and have them yank their ability to access Wikipedia at all? — The Potato Hose 20:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Interesting question. I've never once heard of that happening, and there have been trolls MUCH more disruptive than this guy. The question more interesting than can? is would? Because the answer to have? is "not that I have ever seen." --Jayron32 20:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm curious to know myself, actually. Does the current WMF legal counsel have a talkpage somewhere? — The Potato Hose 19:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• ‎Rubber Tree of Malaya (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Quack. Don't want to go into more detail because beans. — The Potato Hose 19:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Obvious sock is obvious. Feel free to rollback their edits. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 19:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• MoldovskiComunijiliov (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Peoples Communes (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Sunrise Over Giangjing (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Skyen Importenen (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Socialijisajm (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Glory to the WPK! (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Juche Idea Monument (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Harassment at my userpage, self-confessed links to previous TQ socks. Please make this stop. Some are already blocked but may as well fish out sleepers. — The Potato Hose 17:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Requesting CU. Legoktm (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Caught Socialijisajm (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) via the abuse filter. Legoktm (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also Glory to the WPK! (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). At this point I'm not sure if these are the same sockmaster or not... Legoktm (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is there a single ISP being used here? — The Potato Hose 19:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • No it doesn't. I have asked WMF counsel about the possibility of WMF issuing some sort of cease and desist or court order or something to stop these serial idiots from taking up everyone's time. If there is a single ISP being used here, then that is a very easy thing to do. If, on the other hand, TQ is WP:BEANS to access Wiki, that will be harder. — The Potato Hose 19:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Administrator note All accounts blocked. I'll look into semi-ing a few pages. Legoktm (talk) 17:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk endorsed - Options for a rangeblock should be explored. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 17:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Completed. Bunch of hosting ranges blocked, but I'm doubtful that this would stop him. Semi is your best bet here. T. Canens (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Tagged. CU's don't normally review too much info Potato, but he did say he blocked some web hosts, which makes the ISP and originating IP irrelevant. Closing. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 19:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Potato, I'm guessing you aren't familiar with proxies or webhosts, but they hide the ISP if they are configured properly, so that isn't helpful. I'm not aware that the foundation ever really does that anyway. It is a nice theory, but it isn't done in practice. Page reclerked, please leave comments above. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 19:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Workers Sickle (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Agarian Peasent (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Same MO. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk note: Obvious sock is obvious; blocked by Writ, tagged by me; closing. Yunshui 雲‍水 17:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Technoquats Sockpuppet (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Roxette Fanatic (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Super Snooper77 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Techoquatic World (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Stoölenmäärchen (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Aeæaeæ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

One self-admitted and already blocked, the other two are quacking, quacking. The usual pattern, WP:BEANS. Time to clean out the drawer again. — The Potato Hose 17:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a couple more. — The Potato Hose 18:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• CheckUser requested - Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - Behavior is certainly sock like, asking for a CU as one of these may have some other connections. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 23:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that these socks have started showing up on en.wikiquote and en.wikivoyage, so this may require steward attention. --Rschen7754 09:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Technoquats Sockpuppet, Techoquatic World, Stoölenmäärchen, Aeæaeæ, Sainey Yto Beltflashgordon (talk · contribs), Czech Czecg (talk · contribs), Ambivilously (talk · contribs) and a whole nest of blocked accounts are all  Confirmed as Technoquat.
• Roxette Fanatic and Super Snooper77 are the same, but are  Unrelated to Technoquat. There are a couple of possibilities as to who they might be, but I can't be certain at this time. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Blocked two linked but separate socks as uncertain master, although I have some suspicions that the CU can email me about if they chose. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 16:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Tagged as needed, closing. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 16:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• 999Bedbugs (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Quack, beans. — The Potato Hose 17:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Obviously. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 17:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• AfadsBad (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Quack, beans. — The Potato Hose 00:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Obviously. I've been quick archiving under WP:DENY Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 00:50, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • (added after archive) CU was run and it looks unlikely this person was a sock after all, even though there were some superficial similarities in style. I have formally apologized to the editor for the block.[2] Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 23:00, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Somersby Huckleclink (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Again, quacking abounds. WP:BEANS. Note to clerks: please don't just block this one without having it checked, the last one was determined not to be a sock after the fact. — The Potato Hose 03:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed ​—DoRD (talk)​ 04:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Tagged and closing. Legoktm (talk) 04:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Togolaís Díplomátique (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Fits Technoquat's MO. Just appeared at AN/I claiming to work for the Togolese Govt. 24.46.162.17 (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Amstaedeae (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Same evidence as usual. Again, please CU to be sure and/or sweep up sleepers, as there was a mistake with a block recently. — The Potato Hose 18:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• CheckUser requested - Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - My last block was mistaken. Requesting CU to verify this one. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 19:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  On hold - There are some peculiarities here that I need to look at a bit more closely. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Confirmed per case below. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Blocked and tagged. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 13:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• FindaloaWa (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Very Technoquatish MO: three suggestions a few days ago that we block all of Finland ([3], [4], [5] - AFAIK, the promised campaign of vandalism never turned up) and now the usual trollish helpdesk questions. Self-endorsing for CU, both for certainty and to perform the usual trawl for sleepers. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention Yunshui 雲‍水 13:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• This is what I needed to clear the case above.  Confirmed. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Blocked and tagged, closing. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 13:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Kringvarp Føroya (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Toothache from Asidiciale (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Dome Èkitnoek (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• FindaloaWa (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

quack, beans, should be a slam dunk cu. — The Potato Hose 17:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• note, two are already blocked, put here for comparison. — The Potato Hose 17:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• FindaloaWa is already confirmed in the case above.
• Kringvarp Føroya is  Possible.
• Toothache from Asidiciale, Dome Èkitnoek and Punterkunder (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) are  Confirmed. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Blocked and tagged confirmed, leaving open for Kringvarp Føroya whom I was already monitoring. Behavior seems likely. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER
  • I've gone ahead and blocked - Faeroe Islands are very close to Finland, and very small making the TV thing unlikely. --Rschen7754 07:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Trimmed Steok (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Same MO. User page is a copyvio from here John of Reading (talk) 19:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Sauleutaysen (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

See this diff. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&diff=561678969&oldid=561677088 It quacks like User:Technoquat Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Did the CU read the diff before declining? It's an extremely quacky question, plus I'm not sure what else 'techquatical' could be referring to--TQ loves declaring him/herself. — The Potato Hose 05:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Check declined by a checkuser - This request is jumping the gun quite a bit. 1) There is no direct evidence to match this to any previous Technoquat sock except maybe the editing area 2) The edits are not disruptive by themselves 3) One edit is rarely enough for a CU without duck grounds. Try giving it a little time and assuming some good faith. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Blocked per WP:DUCK regardless of declined checkuser, he practically self-declared as Technoquat. --Jayron32 06:01, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing Rschen7754 05:08, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Personally I would have endorsed it in this case (having seen his behavior elsewhere) but the CUs have the ultimate discretion in the tool use. --Rschen7754 06:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Alv Ko Koöp (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

I'm not hugely familiar with this sockmaster, but came across another sock recently without realizing it and this seems to be of the same ilk (trolling projectspace, brand new account). Sailsbystars (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Could be a garden-variety troll or could be Technoquat. Checkuser should probably be run here, this has the broad hallmarks of his MO. --Jayron32 21:25, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk endorsed - per Jayron32. Rschen7754 23:26, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Already blocked by another CU, as are a few other accounts. Looks like we're done here. WilliamH (talk) 07:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Thanks. Rschen7754 07:32, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Filresh Veetable (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&diff=prev&oldid=562444517 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&diff=prev&oldid=562451371 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=562452822 Quacks like a Technoquat WP:DUCK, but request checkuser anyway Robert McClenon (talk) 23:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk declined - Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 23:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Too obvious. I had already blocked him, no need to file these if they are already blocked, via WP:DENY. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 23:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Vine und Viskwi (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&diff=563119903&oldid=563119763

• Trolling at the Help Desk is a characteristic of User:Technoquat - WP:DUCK Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Sorted. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:39, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Reinstate to keen (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&diff=564333013&oldid=564332851

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&diff=564349827&oldid=564346620

Trolling at the Help Desk has the quacking of Technoquat Robert McClenon (talk) 12:12, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk endorsed - Endorsing for a sleeper check. Sockpuppet blocked. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Confirmed plus Bootle Bridge (talk · contribs). ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Technokumquat (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Username is similar to the one used by the sockpuppeteer, whom is a banned user here, xe has created several articles, all of which were deleted. Prabash.Akmeemana 15:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Additional information needed - Aside from the similarity in username, is there anything to suggest this is the same editor? Someguy1221 (talk) 01:48, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I personally don't think so. --Rschen7754 07:38, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing, looks unlikely at this time without further evidence. Rschen7754 09:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• MuchoMejor Cafe (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Mondo Liebknecht (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

MuchoMejor Cafe's (MMC) editing is exclusively to Garvey-related pages. This "mother of three"'s first edit was to add a Wikitag and subsequently created her userpage. Similarly to this, Mondo's first edit was to AFD the article, in the same way Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Garvey (3rd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Garvey (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Garvey were created, in those occasions, both nominators were blocked from editing. Mondo claims to be a sweet grandfather of three, but he behaves like a kid, and also Ann loves coffee (English for "Cafe"). Kate Garvey was full-protected for 12 hours, I asked the protecting admin to downgrade it, but he said he hasn't had experience with Techno, me neither, but it is clear these four accounts are related to the same person, they are new but know how Wikipedia works[6] and they just troll. Once the protection is lifted, I suggest semi-protection of the article. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk endorsed - With provided diffs, and a second account (Mondo) jumping in here with [7] I think a checkuser is definitely in order. NativeForeigner ^Talk 19:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Confirmed Ann Bardrach (talk · contribs), Mondo Liebknecht (talk · contribs), MuchoMejor Cafe (talk · contribs).  Inconclusive connection to Technoquat. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 20:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: The behavior of those three is blatantly Technoquat. Blocked the one unblocked account. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Bootyshorts71 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Like the last sock, this possible sock is editing Garvey-related pages again. In addition, like the last sock, this one is trolling at a Wikipedia-related page (Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities, to be specific) and knows how Wikipedia works despite being new. Was blocked 24 hours for edit warring, but should be upped to indefinite should this be a sock. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed. Blocked and tagged. Closing. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Sekratarie Ofstaate (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

posting about adult diapers on the reference desk http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReference_desk%2FHumanities&diff=566875010&oldid=566870999 which is a mark of Technoquat according to the community ban discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive239#Community_ban_for_Technoquat 184.147.137.9 (talk) 19:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed plus Beef! Beef! Beef! (talk · contribs).
• Boer Asseblief (talk · contribs), BoksombenceKwagga (talk · contribs) and Kingo Mabakiki Shabalanga (talk · contribs) are  Technically indistinguishable from the other two. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Sockpuppets blocked and closed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Hyperbole me out? (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Once again posting about diapers to the reference desks, as per most recent socks. diff 184.147.136.32 (talk) 14:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk note: Closing. I've already blocked the sockpuppet. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Horatio Snickers (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Purely behavioural, but HS has done little but troll reference desks and notice boards, favourite Technoquat territory - see current thread on ANI Wikipedia:ANI#User:Horatio Snickers under the bridge. Note also an early post where HS announces that "I will require this information for my candidacy for the Wikimedia Foundation Board next year" - again typical Technoquat attention-seeking. [8]. There are other behavioural clues too, though it might be best not to be specific here - I'll e-mail them if required. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I am not "Technoquat" nor any other user. I reject the argument that I have done "little but troll reference desks and notice boards". I don't see what's so "attention seeking" about wanting to stand for a position of responsibility on Wikipedia at some point in the future. This seems to be another step in some kind of deliberate attack on me by several users - having witnessed User:AndyTheGrump's vaguely threatening messages on my talk page and User:Medeis seeking any forum to mutter their grievances behind my back, I can't say I'm surprised that there is another spurious plot to remove me from this encylopedia.

I do not believe there are any grounds for this - if there are indeed "other behavioural clues", then present them now - at the moment, there appears to be a clear lack of evidence whatsoever. Horatio Snickers (talk) 16:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no conclusion to be drawn from Snicker's user contribution but that he is the sockpuppet of a blocked user or practised troll. One doesn't immediately start asking well-formatted and bizarre questions at the ref desk without prior practice:

• (→‎how can scully still be sceptical: new section (1st edit under username)
• (→‎murder: new section)
• (→‎is this guy an idiot?: new section)
• (→‎behaviour of a murderer: new section)

The intentionally trolling questions, the interest in murder, and the insincere protestations of hurt feelings and only wanting to help strike me as characteristic of the user Kotjap who was banned a week or two before Snickers showed up. μηδείς (talk) 17:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As the author of the AN/I section I wrote it without suspicion that HS is any particular editor's sockpuppet. It seems to me, however, that his behavior is really quite odd for someone who is supposedly here because he wants to make good contributions toward the writing of an encyclopedia: a few (generally bad) edits to articles, a long interaction at the reference desk that provoked several people to complain on his talk page, and a flippant response in a VP discussion. These really do not incline me to think that he's someone who is interested in actually working on the project. I have no experience with Technoquat but HS's behavior is typical of someone who has been blocked and who comes back to try to annoy people. Mangoe (talk) 19:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given the way this is going it's interesting to note the creation of a sophisticated new user User:Rjatodoum with a request at the Ref Desk that we comment on his dancing. μηδείς (talk) 19:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Xrt6L (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Trolling at Help Desk quacks like Technoquat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&diff=568858838&oldid=568858762

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&diff=568859150&oldid=568858927

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onorem&diff=prev&oldid=568859790 Robert McClenon (talk) 01:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

 Additional information needed How does it quack like Technoquat? Checkusers need the cases to be clearly made and supported with comparative diffs of both the master and the socks. As a side note, anyone considering this case should also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki brah where it has been asserted that these are the same master.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• As someone semi-familiar, it could be Technoquat, but then it could be anybody. --Rschen7754 02:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Declined after no response. --Rschen7754 03:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Closing. I'm not seeing enough evidence to tie these two to Technoquat. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• Belmarshia Vergrade (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Self-confessed sock, and blocked with no TP access to boot; requesting CU to pick up any more he's got lying around. Yunshui 雲‍水 21:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

 Clerk endorsed Self-endorsed for checkuser attention. Yunshui 雲‍水 21:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Confirmed plus a few more. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Confirmed socks all blocked indef, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• KōryoMarshall (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Trolling the helpdesk with faux-Communist terminology is pretty classic Technoquat behaviour. Requesting checkuser for confirmation and sleeper check. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention Yunshui 雲‍水 11:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Likely but no sleepers. NativeForeigner ^Talk 17:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

Suspected sockpuppets

• BollyBœuf (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

edits have mostly revolved around adding Deceased Wikipedian to Technoquat 's user page and coming up with an obscure 2001 book as a source.

Already blocked by me for "not being here" but CU requested to see if there are any sleepers. Nthep (talk) 21:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk endorsed - sleepers check is needed because of the large number of socks previously created by this master. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
•  No sleepers immediately visible. Comparing the limited available technical data, the best I can say is it's  Possible that BollyBœuf is Technoquat. Mike V • Talk 15:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---