Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Management

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Management. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Management|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Management. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Management/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Management

European Operations Management Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flagged for notability since 2020. No references. Can only find passing mentions to the conference it hosts on Google. Orange sticker (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Management, and Europe. Orange sticker (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NORG. Cremastra (talk) 00:58, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT. This is not a judgment of merits of the organization, but rather of the poor writing, formatting, and total lack of sources. Bearian (talk) 03:44, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sohan Lal Commodity Management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

may warrant deletion due to insufficient evidence of notability under Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. If reliable, independent sources do not provide significant coverage of the company's activities or impact, the article fails to meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Loewstisch (talk) 12:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, Management, and Delhi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TC-BT-1C-SI, Hope you are Good. I think Not all the sources are Routine, you can look sources closely. Bakhtar40 (talk) 10:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bakhtar40 as you suggested, I checked again. Only Forbes India qualifies, but that's not enough. The other one, FE, is just an interview in a supplement. According to WP:RSNOI, we should better avoid it. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found a good independent and reliable reference How Sohan Lal is solving the problem of agri-commodity wastage and other from Financial Express. Bakhtar40 (talk) 10:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:47, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The subject meets notability criteria WP:GNG, WP:NCORP with strong, independent coverage from Forbes India, The Hindu Business Line, Financial Express, and Indian Express. These sources provide in-depth analysis of the company’s agri-commodity management, technological innovations, and impact in India’s agricultural sector. The argument for deletion ignores the depth of coverage and misinterprets the reliability of sources.Gaqixyvo (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Swanson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear if this individual is notable enough for own article - does not appear (in my view) to fulfill standards re: notability for creative professionals WP:Author. Is already mentioned in the Secretly Group article. A MINOTAUR (talk) 18:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Management, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. He is mentioned in recent news stories about his labels. There are few in-depth stories that I could find. All the same, given the existing sources and others 1, 2, 3 ... maybe just clears the bar. -- Jaireeodell (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:28, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Air Force Knowledge Now

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no citations actually about the subject except for primary sources. Non-government/non-department of defense sources aren't about AFKN, they're about knowledge management. Fails WP:GNG. v/r - T P 20:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 20:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was the original author. This can be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpoteet (talk • contribs) 01:59, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were an early contributor but not the article creator. And there have been too many contributors to make this article eligible for CSD G7. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Management Proposed deletions

The following articles have been tagged for proposed deletion: