Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backwoods Camp (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 10:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Backwoods Camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Somehow this was kept in a 2011-12 AfD despite there being no objection to deletion. It should have been deleted then, but let's take care of it now since those concerns are still valid today. This camp has not received significant coverage in reliable sources, so it fails WP:GNG. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the simple reason it fails WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 08:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Frankly this might even meet some speedy delete criteria as the description itself doesn't seem to assert any notability.Icewhiz (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Bhagwan Mahaveer Sanctuary and Mollem National Park. Carrite (talk) 02:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make any sense to redirect a title somewhere it's not mentioned. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:N. Just another business venture. Loopy30 (talk) 15:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge content with Bhagwan Mahaveer Sanctuary and Mollem National Park —IM3847 (talk) 02:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. The camp is not part of Bhagwan Mahavir Wildlife Sanctuary. This appears to be a low-profile promotional piece for a commercial outfit. There is no basis for merging to Bhagwan Mahavir Wildlife Sanctuary. --Bejnar (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- spam, with content such as "A visit to Backwoods is a reliable way for birders to see the elusive Sri Lanka frogmouth!" No need for a redirect or a merge. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.