Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blinovitch Limitation Effect (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blinovitch Limitation Effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While a decently recurring element of the show that sees some occasional outside discussion, I simply can't find enough SIGCOV in order to justify its separation as an article. Most of the sources I found were trivial mentions, and while I found one scholar source and a couple of books giving a decent bit on it, I'm fairly certain it isn't enough to qualify as SIGCOV. A short description of the effect in another article would suffice, though whether that be in the main Doctor Who article or elsewhere, I'm not really sure of at this time. Pokelego999 (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. Pokelego999 (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I only find coverage of this on fansites, wikis, and other unreliable sources. Nothing reliable to pass WP:V, let alone WP:SIGCOV to create a reliable reception about its notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I could only find passing mentions of this topic. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is no SIGCOV on the topic. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only passing mentions fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree that it fails WP:SIGCOV. Looking at the mention in the archived Village Voice article "A tech-free bit of science fiction that's inside-baseball enough to reference Blinovitch (a minor Dr. Whocharacter)..." Representative of the sources for the article. MtBotany (talk) 16:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.