Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Cricket League (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep main article, redirect others to Celebrity Cricket League. (non-admin closure) f e minist 04:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Cricket League

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know we should keep this article. If yes then there are many in line. These kind of leagues are not notable as no notable cricketer is playing in the league. Added that it can be notable with coverage in many notable sites, but its season can't establish same notability so this discussion is more for seasons. Greenbörg (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Greenbörg (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Celebrity Cricket League- there was a strong consensus to do so before, and it can't suddenly have become less notable. Delete the specific season articles though, as we normally only have season articles for first class/List A cricket seasons, and this is neither. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep tournament article. Tournament clearly passes WP:GNG. The season articles should have been nominated separately. Hack (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep main article, which demonstrably meets WP:GNG. As Hack suggests, the season articles should really be listed separately, as they require more discussion that isn't relevant to the main tournament article. Harrias ^talk 08:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep tournament article and delete season articles per the above. Jack | ^{talk page} 13:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep tournament article per above. The individual season articles should be redirected rather than deleted per WP:NSEASONS. Smartyllama (talk) 14:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NSEASONS, meets GNG. Needs cleanup, though. South Nashua (talk) 02:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.