Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Vezelis (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Vezelis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of sources or other evidence of notability. Futhermore, ordained by a sedevacantist prelate, he consequently never was a bishop of the Catholic church. NAH 16:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:NBIO as per nom. Kirbanzo (talk) 17:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - In a related AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giles Butler, it was noted by that article's creator that this group had, at the time, 6 ordained members, 2 of which were bishops. It doesn't seem like the group has grown since then. Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not pass WP:GNG and too small a group for a bishop to be presumed notable Atlantic306 (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.