Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Shot (Serbian band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One Shot (Serbian band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No results in a Google search. No presence in Serbian or Serbo-Croat Wiki. The only citations are to (1) their FB page and (2) their record label Bassivity Music, whose page does not mention them. All non-trivial links are redlinks. Narky Blert (talk) 23:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page because this album by this band also fails WP:MUSIC

One Shot Mixtape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Narky Blert (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Both pages for lacking any kind of notability. Meatsgains (talk) 00:39, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:V, WP:MUSICBIO. If they've been active for a decade, why are there no reliable sources to prove notability? Bearian (talk) 20:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both as there's certainly speedy material here, nothing at all let alone suggesting notability and substantial improvements, and based from this, it seems it's not going to happen. SwisterTwister talk 00:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.