Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation: Cliff Clavin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chris Clavin. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Operation: Cliff Clavin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band; lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, failing WP:GNG / WP:BAND. Previously deleted in 2005, article recreated in 2007. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not independently notable, plus lacks sourcing. At best, redirect to Chris Clavin, although I'm not even convinced that person should have a wikipedia page due to lack of sourcing. It must have been created and slipped through the cracks back in the old days when Wikipedia had very lax criteria for WP:MUSICIANS. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Easy redirect to Chris Clavin, and let info about the band spin out summary style. As for whether the individual is notable, there are additional sources on its talk page. czar 04:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Czar's suggestion. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 15:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.