- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 23:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Red Bar Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article was previously deleted in this discussion, but that was long enough ago that a speedy deletion as recreation of deleted content would not be appropriate. The subject is a podcast, and there may be sources that establish its notability under WP:WEB, but they don't appear in this article. The article has no independent sources, and contains a lot of content of no particular significance such as lists of former co-hosts of the show and pop culture topics that the hosts have talked about. Based on the current state of the article, a non-speedy delete would be appropriate. Metropolitan90 05:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Page lists who they make fun of, fer the love of pete. Nothing else at all notable appears on the page. They have had months to find citations. Is there a way to prevent them from recreating the page? Speciate 05:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of coverage from independent sources Corpx 05:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find any independent, notable coverage. - JNighthawk 03:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There are several independent sources that testify to the notability of the subject; moderator User:Stormie was sufficiently impressed by the material offered to recreate the article after it was deleted by him. I do agree though, the article does need to be rewritten with sources included. Instead of a deletion order, the article needs to be cleaned up before it can be properly assessed for its notability. I'll do that shortly, so I ask voting and action be held off until then. DeusExMachina 23:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and the evidence that was on Stormie's talk page has been posted to this article's talk page by him. Thanks Stormie. DeusExMachina 03:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Haha yes indeed, I saved that, then got distracted before I could save my comment here pointing to them. See Talk:Red Bar Radio#Notability. --Stormie 04:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and the evidence that was on Stormie's talk page has been posted to this article's talk page by him. Thanks Stormie. DeusExMachina 03:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There are several independent sources that testify to the notability of the subject; moderator User:Stormie was sufficiently impressed by the material offered to recreate the article after it was deleted by him. I do agree though, the article does need to be rewritten with sources included. Instead of a deletion order, the article needs to be cleaned up before it can be properly assessed for its notability. I'll do that shortly, so I ask voting and action be held off until then. DeusExMachina 23:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.