Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sai Ronak (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sai Ronak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He's been in some films, but the career section even says they weren't successful except for one. He's directed a film which just came out; that's where his GNews hits come from. TheHindu has a nice writeup about him, but I don't see anything else. I don't think he meets WP:DIRECTOR, not with his current body of work; same for WP:NACTOR, nor WP:GNG. Mr. Vernon (talk) 08:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mr. Vernon (talk) 08:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The person easliy passes WP:NACTOR as he appeared in multiple films in important roles. And he did not direct Lanka, his charecter's name was director.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This actor has starred in several films (including the critically acclaimed Pathasala) and his acting has been praised by The Times of India in several of his films. -- DragoMynaa

• Saying Sai put up a "sterling performance" (literally, all it says in the Kaadhali article about him) doesn't even qualify for WP:GNG. That's not significant coverage. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think every single article should pass WP:GNG. There are WP:ACADEMIC, WP:NPOL, WP:NACTOR and so on.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 10:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: As per WP:HEY—the article now contains four reliable sources, the contents of which, in my opinion, provide significant coverage for the purposes of WP:GNG. I think WP:NACTOR is also established, and, as pointed out above, WP:DIRECTOR isn't relevant to the discussion. The subject seems to be a rising actor who has already got lead roles under his belt. Dflaw4 (talk) 15:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.