Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam the Kid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sam the Kid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consists of unreliable sources. Someone speaking Portuguese should assess the reliability of the Rimasebatidas source, as that is the only source that can possible be reliable..  » Shadowowl | talk 16:34, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:53, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:53, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'm currently replacing all the sources; just a note to !voters: this[1] was the version that was nominated for deletion. RetiredDuke (talk) 16:36, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Subject clears WP:GNG, as he has got "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". As of now, all of the sources present in the article are reliable, so no issues on that front. The book, the magazine article and the french review make for significant coverage that is independent of the subject, as well as the news article from Diário Notícias Madeira. This source[2] does have a very significant intro on the artists preceding the interview. Sources as this[3] or the documentary (both on big public TV channels) do show his relevance on the field of Portuguese hip-hop. The article still requires clean up and some expanding using the provided sources but alas, AFD is not clean up. A WP:BEFORE would have been appreciated, though. RetiredDuke (talk) 23:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I don't know how an editor who does not speak Portuguese think they can possibly vet sources here. A source has been added, subject is a veteran on the Portuguese hip-hop scene and meets GNG, it is merely a matter of translating the Portuguese article. This nomination is one of the now retired User:Shadowowl's 239 nominations within a few weeks. Filed within a few minutes of their last edit, I don't think due diligence or any policy-required ATD-considerations were given proper attention. Sam Sailor 08:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Did you see the comment above that the referenced was replaced? This was the article version that was nominated https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sam_the_Kid&oldid=850234823 --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:10, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.