Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oxford Gargoyles (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Oxford Gargoyles

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was redirected following an AfD in 2006 and, over the last 12 years, Wikipedia notability standards have raised. Though The Oxford Gargoyles won the 2010 Voice Festival (against limited competition) I don't consider that to be sufficient to warrant a Wikipedia article. I can't find any news coverage, or significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, other than the occasional student newspaper. Fails WP:GNG - I'd say SALT the article name if it is deleted. Sionk (talk) 19:41, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or redirect to the list article as was done in the first AfD). They did a little international tour in 2015, which got them the only independent media piece that I can find: [1] That's one event in which they received reliable coverage but otherwise they are known through self-promotion and crowdfunding appeals. Not enough for independent notability. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.